Remember a couple of entries ago, when I expressed shock and dismay at being called my son's dad in public? I cross-posted it to Zuckerberg's data mine. Drama ensued. Once again, it was an unpleasant surprise. I mean, it's wonderful that plenty of my friends have my back, but it's less than wonderful that some of them now aren't speaking to each other. And some of the 'splaining that went on was kind of like watching the fireball from a derailed fuel train: hypnotic and voluminous, but messy and tragic.
Resolved: I'm not going to censor myself over this or anything like it in the future. And you know things like this are going to keep on happening for the rest of my life.
It's yet another hard lesson in what people around me are really made of, but no one gets to tell me how to feel or what to write about any of this.
Resolved: I'm not going to censor myself over this or anything like it in the future. And you know things like this are going to keep on happening for the rest of my life.
It's yet another hard lesson in what people around me are really made of, but no one gets to tell me how to feel or what to write about any of this.
Have chainsaw, will travel
Date: 2014-05-06 10:39 pm (UTC)From:I am very sorry to set the torch to gasoline in your space, but I would like to point out that she presumed I was speaking about her (I wasn't, in fact). And that speaks volumes about her own feelings on the subject of friendship vis-a-vis the rights of trans* people, IMO.
Re: Have chainsaw, will travel
Date: 2014-05-06 11:54 pm (UTC)From:Also, my surprised face: gosh, Nibs was quick to defend the neighbor? Never would have guessed.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 12:01 am (UTC)From:You've got a dag. I'd say it if you didn't. Hell, I'd say it anyway, just a lot more crudely than May be appropriate.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 01:22 am (UTC)From:::headdesk, headdesk, headdesk::
Seriously, that was so full of what the fuck I didn't even know how to wrap my head around it. I responded as civilly as I could, but I'll tell you, that was like the 5th edit removing things like "Are you fucking kidding me?", "You cannot actually be taking that stance with a straight face.", "This MUST be an initiation trolling prank from 4chan because no one who has been around Maura for that long could POSSIBLY be making that argument.", and "Oh my god, good riddance."
I can be civil when I have to.
But jesus fuck.
~Aramada
no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 02:02 am (UTC)From:I haven't enjoyed this debate, but reading what you wrote was comforting. There's a reason why you're involved in the law.
And long time no see! Do you still haunt any of the old haunts?
no subject
Date: 2014-05-08 09:04 am (UTC)From:I mean, hell, most of them can't even figure out people who change their *name* or *hair color*.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-08 01:37 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 03:52 am (UTC)From:To the Average Amurrican(TM), the vaguest concept of a Dad becoming anything at all other than a dad is about as remote from their so-called mind as a fish becoming a bicycle. To such a person, there is literally nothing you could ever do whatsoever to become anything other than a dad. Your appearance, your driver's license, hell, your very existence simply doesn't enter into it.
I'm not saying they're right. I'm not saying it's not offensive. But I am saying that it's true, and you have no chance in hell of ever changing it.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 05:13 am (UTC)From:And the way that either kind of progress happens is by speaking out, and by appealing to the better nature of the Average Amurrican®. If the cis queers can do it, so can trans people. Yes, there are fewer of us than there are cis queers, and we're not as rich per capita, but the strategy is proven.
This is your virtual happy pill for the day, good for misanthropy and dandruff.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 02:35 am (UTC)From:Maura, you're one **solid** woman, in my estimation.
/elane
no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 07:17 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 03:15 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 02:28 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 04:27 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2014-05-07 04:30 pm (UTC)From:Is a puzzlement
Date: 2014-05-07 01:16 pm (UTC)From:While not defending the clueless neighbor I'd venture to guess that a lot of non-LGBTQ persons would not have, off the top of their heads, quite known what to say.
To me, the OBVIOUS thing would be, "Oh, look, there's Maura and her son!" would be just fine, but I can sort of see an ignorant (not necessarily stupid, just ignorant, as in not knowledgable) person starting off with, "Oh look there's BOY and his..." and then possibly floundering upon realizing that Dad doesn't fit anymore but not knowing offhand what does fit.
But just saying flippantly, "Oh look, there's boy and his dad!" clearly does NOT fit and should not have been uttered!
Re: Is a puzzlement
Date: 2014-05-07 02:30 pm (UTC)From: